Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/x86: fix spelling mistake "FAILT" -> "FAIL"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/1/19 7:12 AM, walter harms wrote:


Am 01.07.2019 15:04, schrieb Colin King:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There is an spelling mistake in an a test error message. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
index 4602326b8f5b..a4f4d4cf22c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int test_vsys_x(void)
  		printf("[OK]\tExecuting the vsyscall page failed: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
  		       segv_err);
  	} else {
-		printf("[FAILT]\tExecution failed with the wrong error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
+		printf("[FAIL]\tExecution failed with the wrong error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
  		       segv_err);
  		return 1;
  	}


"wrong error" sounds like scratching table, perhaps "error" is here sufficient ?
Bomus points when user is expected to report this.


Just "error" would not accurate her. I think the intent is to say
that syscall returned an invalid error code. "Invalid error code"
would be accurate.


It would be helpful to report the expected error code.

thanks,
-- Shuah



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux