From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:37:33 -0400 > Specific to the above test, I can add a check command testing > setsockopt SO_ZEROCOPY return value. AFAIK kselftest has no explicit > way to denote "skipped", so this would just return "pass". Sounds a > bit fragile, passing success when a feature is absent. Especially since the feature might be absent because the 'config' template forgot to include a necessary Kconfig option.
