On 12/06/2019 15:21, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> On arm64 the TCR_EL1.TBI0 bit has been always enabled hence
> the userspace (EL0) is allowed to set a non-zero value in the
> top byte but the resulting pointers are not allowed at the
> user-kernel syscall ABI boundary.
>
> With the relaxed ABI proposed through this document, it is now possible
> to pass tagged pointers to the syscalls, when these pointers are in
> memory ranges obtained by an anonymous (MAP_ANONYMOUS) mmap().
>
> This change in the ABI requires a mechanism to requires the userspace
> to opt-in to such an option.
>
> Specify and document the way in which sysctl and prctl() can be used
> in combination to allow the userspace to opt-in this feature.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.txt | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.txt b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..96e149e2c55c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +ARM64 TAGGED ADDRESS ABI
> +========================
> +
> +This document describes the usage and semantics of the Tagged Address
> +ABI on arm64.
> +
> +1. Introduction
> +---------------
> +
> +On arm64 the TCR_EL1.TBI0 bit has been always enabled on the arm64 kernel,
> +hence the userspace (EL0) is allowed to set a non-zero value in the top
> +byte but the resulting pointers are not allowed at the user-kernel syscall
> +ABI boundary.
> +
> +This document describes a relaxation of the ABI with which it is possible
> +to pass tagged tagged pointers to the syscalls, when these pointers are in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
typo.
> +memory ranges obtained as described in paragraph 2.
> +
> +Since it is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses
> +into the kernel indiscriminately, arm64 provides a new sysctl interface
> +(/proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr) that is used to prevent the applications from
> +enabling the relaxed ABI and a new prctl() interface that can be used to
> +enable or disable the relaxed ABI.
> +
> +The sysctl is meant also for testing purposes in order to provide a simple
> +way for the userspace to verify the return error checking of the prctl()
> +command without having to reconfigure the kernel.
> +
> +The ABI properties are inherited by threads of the same application and
> +fork()'ed children but cleared when a new process is spawn (execve()).
OK.
> +
> +2. ARM64 Tagged Address ABI
> +---------------------------
> +
> +From the kernel syscall interface prospective, we define, for the purposes
^^^^^^^^^^^
perspective
> +of this document, a "valid tagged pointer" as a pointer that either it has
> +a zero value set in the top byte or it has a non-zero value, it is in memory
> +ranges privately owned by a userspace process and it is obtained in one of
> +the following ways:
> + - mmap() done by the process itself, where either:
> + * flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS
> + * flags = MAP_PRIVATE and the file descriptor refers to a regular
> + file or "/dev/zero"
this does not make it clear if MAP_FIXED or other
flags are valid (there are many map flags i don't
know, but at least fixed should work and stack/growsdown.
i'd expect anything that's not incompatible with
private|anon to work).
> + - a mapping below sbrk(0) done by the process itself
doesn't the mmap rule cover this?
> + - any memory mapped by the kernel in the process's address space during
> + creation and following the restrictions presented above (i.e. data, bss,
> + stack).
OK.
Can a null pointer have a tag?
(in case NULL is valid to pass to a syscall)
> +
> +The ARM64 Tagged Address ABI is an opt-in feature, and an application can
> +control it using the following prctl()s:
> + - PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL: can be used to enable the Tagged Address ABI.
> + - PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL: can be used to check the status of the Tagged
> + Address ABI.
> +
> +As a consequence of invoking PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL prctl() by an applications,
> +the ABI guarantees the following behaviours:
> +
> + - Every current or newly introduced syscall can accept any valid tagged
> + pointers.
> +
> + - If a non valid tagged pointer is passed to a syscall then the behaviour
> + is undefined.
> +
> + - Every valid tagged pointer is expected to work as an untagged one.
> +
> + - The kernel preserves any valid tagged pointers and returns them to the
> + userspace unchanged in all the cases except the ones documented in the
> + "Preserving tags" paragraph of tagged-pointers.txt.
OK.
i guess pointers of another process are not "valid tagged
pointers" for the current one, so e.g. in ptrace the
ptracer has to clear the tags before PEEK etc.
> +
> +A definition of the meaning of tagged pointers on arm64 can be found in:
> +Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt.
> +
> +3. ARM64 Tagged Address ABI Exceptions
> +--------------------------------------
> +
> +The behaviours described in paragraph 2, with particular reference to the
> +acceptance by the syscalls of any valid tagged pointer are not applicable
> +to the following cases:
> + - mmap() addr parameter.
> + - mremap() new_address parameter.
> + - prctl_set_mm() struct prctl_map fields.
> + - prctl_set_mm_map() struct prctl_map fields.
i don't understand the exception: does it mean
that passing a tagged address to these syscalls
is undefined?
> +
> +4. Example of correct usage
> +---------------------------
> +
> +void main(void)
> +{
> + static int tbi_enabled = 0;
> + unsigned long tag = 0;
> +
> + char *ptr = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> +
> + if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE,
> + 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> + tbi_enabled = 1;
> +
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -1;
mmap returns MAP_FAILED on failure.
> +
> + if (tbi_enabled)
> + tag = rand() & 0xff;
> +
> + ptr = (char *)((unsigned long)ptr | (tag << TAG_SHIFT));
> +
> + *ptr = 'a';
> +
> + ...
> +}
> +
>
