On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > The test is an adaption of the same test for x86. Note that there > are some differences in the way how s390x deals with the kvm_valid_regs > in struct kvm_run, so some of the tests had to be removed. Also this > test is not using the ucall() interface on s390x yet (which would need > some work to be usable on s390x), so it simply drops out of the VM with > a diag 0x501 breakpoint instead. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + > .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 514d1f88ee26..68f76ee9e821 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -8645,6 +8645,7 @@ F: arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h > F: arch/s390/include/asm/kvm* > F: arch/s390/kvm/ > F: arch/s390/mm/gmap.c > +F: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ > F: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/*/s390x/ Do we need these lines added? We have tools/testing/selftests/kvm/ in the common KVM section already. If we do want to specify them specifically, then I guess we need x86 and arm MAINTAINERS updates as well. Thanks, drew
