On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:49:25 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > New version: > > > > x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions > > > > In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push > > Sorry to keep nitpicking, but "call functions" -> "function calls" would > sound more accurate to me (in both subject and description). I disagree ;-) Matters how you look at it. I look at it as emulating the "call" function, not a function call. Like emulating an "addl" function, or a "jmp" function. See? To remove the ambiguity, I could replace "function" with "instruction". > > Otherwise it looks good. Thanks! -- Steve
