On Tue, 7 May 2019 11:12:27 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't look at Peter's patch and think "this is the solution for int3 > emulate calls". I see Peter's patch as "Thanks God, we are finally > getting rid of the cause of all theses work around hacks all over the > place! and oh by the way, we can easily implement int3 call emulation > because of it". Note, if you really are adamant on your solution, I can write them up, test them, and get them out for this merge window. I really want a solution for the int3 emulate calls, as there is a real bug here that they fix. But I will say, I still prefer Peter's solution. Maybe in the future we can revisit it again. -- Steve
