On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:45:11 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we go with Peter's patch, I can make this code much more sane, and > not have to worry about having ®s->sp be at the top of the stack. I > could simply, just push everything in the order of pt_regs and call the > handler. Hi Steve, I need to catch up with the origin of this series, but it seems also good to optprobe which is doing similar trick on pt_regs. If we can assume that int3 pt_regs can have a gap, optprobe can also make a gap, and it can be also used for storing destination address. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
