On Fri, 3 May 2019 09:44:35 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:35 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:31:26PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I guess the real question is, what's the performance impact of doing > > > that? > > > > Is there anyone that considers i386 a performance platform? > > Not me. As far as I'm concerned, I will basically always gladly trade > several cycles for simplicity on 32-bit. > So should I wait for a new PATCH 1 from Peter to implement it this way? I'd like to get this into the next merge window (although, I am marking it for stable since it fixes a bug for live kernel patching). Linus, what's your thoughts? -- Steve
