On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 11:01:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > This looks sane to me, although I'm surprised that we didn't already > have an annotation for the nonstandard stack frame for asm files. That > probably would be cleaner in a separate commit, but I guess it doesn't > matter. > > Anyway, I'm willing to consider the entry code version if it looks a > _lot_ simpler than this (so I'd like to see them side-by-side), but > it's not like this looks all that complicated to me either. So I posted one earlier today: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190501131117.GW2623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx it's about a 1/3rd the number of lines and has 32bit support. It also provides all the bits required to implement static_call(). That is; I think I'm firmly in favour of the entry variant -- provided it actually works of course.
