On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:24 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Side note: we *already* depend on sti shadow working in other parts of the kernel, namely sti->iret.
>
> Where? STI; IRET would be nuts.
Sorry, not 'sti;iret' but 'sti;sysexit'
> before commit 4214a16b02971c60960afd675d03544e109e0d75
> x86/asm/entry/64/compat: Use SYSRETL to return from compat mode SYSENTER
>
> we did sti; sysxit, but, when we discussed this, I don't recall anyone
> speaking up in favor of the safely of the old code.
We still have that sti sysexit in the 32-bit code.
Linus
