On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:49 PM Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 3:02 AM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > +extern char kernel_headers_data; > > > > +extern char kernel_headers_data_end; > > > > + > > > > +static ssize_t > > > > +ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf, > > > > > > Could you stretch this line ? > > > It will still fit in 80-cols. > > > > > > (This is a coding style error in kernel/configs.c) > > > > It takes 87 cols if I expand, so I'll leave it as is. > > > > > Sorry if what I said was unclear. > > Since I just did not a good reason to put > "static ssize_t" in the previous line, > I meant like follows: > > > [Before] > static ssize_t > ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf, > size_t len, loff_t *offset) > > > > [After] > static ssize_t ikheaders_read_current(struct file *file, char __user *buf, > size_t len, loff_t *offset) > > > (takes 74-cols.) > > > (I am sending this from Gmail, so I am not sure > how it will look like from you...) > > > Anyway, it is super-bikeshedding stuff. > It is OK as-is. > What about sorting the files for determinism?