Re: [PATCH v4a 1/2] selftests/kexec: make tests independent of IMA being enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 16:09 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Mimi
> On 03/22/19 at 03:35pm, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Verify IMA is enabled before failing tests or emitting irrelevant
> > messages.  Also, don't skip the test if signatures are not required.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Dave, if this patch resolves the outstanding issues, I can fold these
> > changes into the original patches. (Reminder, these patches will need to
> > be updated to support the "lockdown" patch set.)
> 
> They looks good to me, thanks for the update

I've folded the kexec_file_load changes into the kexec_file_load test.
 The remaining kexec_load change is left as a separate patch, since it
is dependent on the ikconfig change.

> Feel free to add my reviewed-by, I did some tests although not cover all
> ima cases.

Thanks!  Is this meant as a general "reviewed-by" for all of the
patches or just this specific one?

Mimi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux