On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 13:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > I wonder, though, if you can spend a little more time on these. They > look a little "raw". They're virtually free of comments and there is no > explanation of what the tests do or why they do them. I honestly forget > things like what XSAVE has to do with fork() failing, for instance. I will add comments of what problems each test detects. > I'd question why we need 5 different .c files. It also seems like > things like set_ymm() could be trivially factored into a .h rather than > making 5 copies of them. Each C file contains only one single test and can be built with one command, e.g. "gcc xsave_check_exec.c", or as part of the whole selftest. I am hoping that, should any test fail, one can easily modify the test to find out why. Yes, I will move set_ymm() to a header file. Yu-cheng
