On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM <Tim.Bird@xxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > > There are some > > other features we would like to add which would help with that goal as > > well like test isolation. We actually have a presubmit server > > internally for running KUnit tests that can usually respond to patches > > with test results within a couple minutes. Would something like that > > be interesting? > I think the code and architecture of the software that handles presubmit, > mail-list scanning, notifications, etc. would be of interest. But KUnit features > themselves (macro definitions, mocking vs. faking, etc.) would not. > I only say that in the context of CC-ing the automated testing list on the patch set. > Of course the KUnit features are interesting by themselves for testers doing > unit testing. Fair enough. Well, we will share what we have in that regard, but that belongs on a separate thread. BTW, what mailing list is that? I am also guessing your code isn't in the kernel repo; where is it?
