Hi Naresh, Please use shuah@xxxxxxxxxx for faster responses. I updated MAINTAINERS entry a while back removing shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx address due to IT infrastructure changes at Samsung. On 10/08/2018 08:55 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Daniel, > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 18:58, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 10/08/2018 03:13 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >>> BPF test case test_kmod.sh hangs on all devices running linux next. >>> >>> + cd /opt/kselftests/default-in-kernel/bpf >>> + ./test_kmod.sh >>> sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable: No such file or directory >>> sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden: No such file or directory >>> sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable: No such file or directory >>> sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden: No such file or directory >>> [ JIT enabled:0 hardened:0 ] >>> >>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/429726 >>> >>> Test hangs started from 4.19.0-rc4-next-20180918. >>> Linux version 4.19.0-rc4-next-20180918 (oe-user@oe-host) (gcc version >>> 7.1.1 20170707 (Linaro GCC 7.1-2017.08)) #1 SMP Tue Sep 18 05:26:00 >>> UTC 2018 >>> >>> History can be compared from this page. >>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/tests/kselftest/bpf_test_kmod.sh >>> >>> OTOH, >>> There is a kernel BUG, >> >> This is quite an old linux-next kernel, should be fixed by 100811936f89 ("bpf: test_bpf: >> add init_net to dev for flow_dissector"). Please make sure you have that commit included >> in your testing: > > I will re-validate on latest code base and let you know. > >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=100811936f89fd455eda1984810c09003550555b > > Thanks for the quick reply. > Great. Looks like this has been sorted. Thanks Daniel. thanks, -- Shuah
