Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] selftests, powerpc, x86 : Memory Protection Keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/14/2018 02:44 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
Test
----
Verified for correctness on powerpc. Need help verifying on x86.
Compiles on x86.

It breaks make in tools/testing/selftests/x86:

make: *** No rule to make target `protection_keys.c', needed by `/home/linux/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys_64'. Stop.

The generic implementation no longer builds 32-bit binaries. Is this the intent?

It's possible to build 32-bit binaries with “make CC='gcc -m32'”, so perhaps this is good enough?

But with that, I get a warning:

protection_keys.c: In function ‘dump_mem’:
protection_keys.c:172:3: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat=]
   dprintf1("dump[%03d][@%p]: %016lx\n", i, ptr, *ptr);
   ^

I suppose you could use %016llx and add a cast to unsigned long long to fix this.

Anyway, both the 32-bit and 64-bit tests fail here:

assert() at protection_keys.c::943 test_nr: 12 iteration: 1
running abort_hooks()...

I've yet checked what causes this. It's with the kernel headers from 4.17, but with other userspace headers based on glibc 2.17. I hope to look into this some more before the weekend, but I eventually have to return the test machine to the pool.

Thanks,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux