On 05/22/2018 09:49 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:43:28 -0600 > >> On 05/18/2018 10:21 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote: >>> Test 6fb4 creates one mirred and one pipe action, but only flushes mirred >>> on teardown. Leaking pipe action causes failures in other tests. >>> >>> Add additional teardown command to also flush gact actions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json | 3 ++- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json >>> index 443c9b3..acb24f7 100644 >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json >>> @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ >>> "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: mirred \\(Egress Redirect to device lo\\).*index 2 ref", >>> "matchCount": "1", >>> "teardown": [ >>> - "$TC actions flush action mirred" >>> + "$TC actions flush action mirred", >>> + "$TC actions flush action gact" >>> ] >>> }, >>> { >>> >> >> I can get this into 4.18-rc1 unless there is a reason for this to go >> through net tree. > > Why wouldn't a networking testing bug fix go through my tree? > I usually take the selftest patches unless there is dependency on another tree. I am fine with it going through net tree Acked-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html