On 03/27/2018 11:00 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:52:57AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> On 03/27/2018 05:06 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 08:02:30PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:20:10AM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:55:13AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 05:23:28PM +0800, changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 5 +++-- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile >>>>>>> index 5c43c18..dc0fdc8 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile >>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile >>>>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ ifneq ($(wildcard $(GENHDR)),) >>>>>>> GENFLAGS := -DHAVE_GENHDR >>>>>>> endif >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS) -I../../../include >>>>>>> +CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS) \ >>>>>>> + -I../../../include -I../../../../usr/include >>>>>>> LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order >>>>>>> @@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ else >>>>>>> CPU ?= generic >>>>>>> endif >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -CLANG_FLAGS = -I. -I./include/uapi -I../../../include/uapi \ >>>>>>> +CLANG_FLAGS = -I. -I./include/uapi -I../../../include/uapi -I../../../../usr/include \ >>>>>>> -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types >>>>>> >>>>>> Nack. >>>>>> I suspect that will break the build for everyone else who's doing it in the directory >>>>>> itself instead of the outer one. >>>>> >>>>> This one? But I didn't see any problem. >>>> >>>> because the build was lucky and additional path ../../../../usr/include didn't point >>>> to a valid dir? >> >> Agree. >> >>> I am sorry but I don't understand why you mean *lucky*. Of cause, the path is valid. >> >> The problem is that this suddenly requires users to do a 'make headers_install' in >> order to populate usr/include/ directory in the first place. While it's annoying >> enough for BPF samples where this is needed, I absolutely don't want to introduce >> this for BPF kselftests. It's the wrong approach. Besides, in tools infra, there is >> a tools/arch/*/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h header copy already, so we really need >> to use that instead. Please adapt your patch accordingly and respin. Please also Cc >> us and netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for BPF kselftests changes. >> > Thanks for the explanation. So we expect that tools/arch/*/include is in the searching list, right? > The corrent makefile seems not. How do you get this built? E.g. take a look at tools/include/asm/barrier.h or tools/include/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h just to name two examples. We'd need something similar to this which then points to the arch specific includes. Thanks, Daniel > changbin@gvt-dell-host:~/work/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf$ make -p > [...] > clang -I. -I./include/uapi -I../../../include/uapi -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types \ > -O2 -target bpf -emit-llvm -c test_pkt_access.c -o - | \ > llc -march=bpf -mcpu=generic -filetype=obj -o /home/changbin/work/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_access.o > In file included from test_pkt_access.c:9: > In file included from ../../../include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:11: > In file included from ./include/uapi/linux/types.h:5: > /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11:10: fatal error: 'asm/bitsperlong.h' file not found > #include <asm/bitsperlong.h> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
