On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:19:46 +0530 Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Masami :) > > On 03/22/2018 03:53 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:29:59 +0530 > > Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> Is it okay to allow user to specify array size with type field? > > Fro this patch, yes. > > So IIUC, perf _tool_ will allow user to record array either with "name[range]" > or by "name:type[length]". Please correct me if that's wrong. Yes, it is correct. > And If perf tool will allow array length along with TYPE field, I guess we should > document that in man perf-probe? Ah, right. OK, I'll add it. Thanks! > > Otherwise, > > Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks, > Ravi > > > The availability of type is checked only when > > it is automatically generated. > > IMO, it should be done in another patch, something like > > "Validate user specified type casting" patch. Would you need it? > > > > Thank you, > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
