On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Shuah Khan shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathew,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Test the new MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED and
>>> MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED commands.
>>>
>>> Add checks expecting specific error values on system calls expected to
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: gromer@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> CC: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson@xxxxxx>
>>> CC: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ---
>>> .../testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c | 109
>>
>> Did you run get_maintainers script on this patch? I am curious why
>> get_maintainers didn't include linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and
>> shuah@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> My mistake. I'll add this script to my checklist before I send out
> patches.
>
> If OK with you, I can just add the ML in CC here.
>
Please add everybody get_maintainers suggest for this patch as well.
If this patch is going through linux-kselftest, you will have to resend the
patch to me at some point, so I can pull it in.
I am guessing this has dependency on the other patches in the series
and will go through the primary tree. In that case CC is just fine and I will
review it and Ack it.
thanks,
-- Shuah
>>
>> Please make sure you send the patches to
>> ++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>> index 21399fcf1a59..f85657374b59 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>> @@ -15,49 +15,119 @@ static int sys_membarrier(int cmd, int flags)
>>> static int test_membarrier_cmd_fail(void)
>>> {
>>> int cmd = -1, flags = 0;
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier invalid command";
>>>
>>> if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != -1) {
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> - "sys membarrier invalid command test: command = %d,
>>> flags = %d. Should fail, but passed\n",
>>> - cmd, flags);
>>> + "%s test: command = %d, flags = %d. Should fail, but
>>> passed\n",
>>> + test_name, cmd, flags);
>>> + }
>>> + if (errno != EINVAL) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d. Should return (%d: \"%s\"), but
>>> returned (%d: \"%s\").\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, EINVAL, strerror(EINVAL),
>>> + errno, strerror(errno));
>>> }
>>>
>>> ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> - "sys membarrier invalid command test: command = %d, flags = %d.
>>> Failed as expected\n",
>>> - cmd, flags);
>>> + "%s test: command = %d, flags = %d, errno = %d. Failed as
>>> expected\n",
>>> + test_name, cmd, flags, errno);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int test_membarrier_flags_fail(void)
>>> {
>>> int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY, flags = 1;
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY invalid
>>> flags";
>>>
>>> if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != -1) {
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> - "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY invalid flags test:
>>> flags = %d. Should fail, but passed\n",
>>> - flags);
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d. Should fail, but passed\n",
>>> + test_name, flags);
>>> + }
>>> + if (errno != EINVAL) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d. Should return (%d: \"%s\"), but
>>> returned (%d: \"%s\").\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, EINVAL, strerror(EINVAL),
>>> + errno, strerror(errno));
>>> }
>>>
>>> ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> - "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY invalid flags test: flags =
>>> %d. Failed as expected\n",
>>> - flags);
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d, errno = %d. Failed as expected\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, errno);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int test_membarrier_success(void)
>>> +static int test_membarrier_shared_success(void)
>>> {
>>> int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED, flags = 0;
>>> - const char *test_name = "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED\n";
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED";
>>> +
>>> + if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != 0) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d, errno = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, errno);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d\n", test_name, flags);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int test_membarrier_private_expedited_fail(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED, flags = 0;
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED
>>> not registered failure";
>>> +
>>> + if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != -1) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d. Should fail, but passed\n",
>>> + test_name, flags);
>>> + }
>>> + if (errno != EPERM) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d. Should return (%d: \"%s\"), but
>>> returned (%d: \"%s\").\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, EPERM, strerror(EPERM),
>>> + errno, strerror(errno));
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d, errno = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, errno);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int test_membarrier_register_private_expedited_success(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED, flags = 0;
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier
>>> MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED";
>>>
>>> if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != 0) {
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> - "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED test: flags =
>>> %d\n",
>>> - flags);
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d, errno = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, errno);
>>> }
>>>
>>> ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> - "sys membarrier MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED test: flags = %d\n",
>>> - flags);
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int test_membarrier_private_expedited_success(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED, flags = 0;
>>> + const char *test_name = "sys membarrier
>>> MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED";
>>> +
>>> + if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != 0) {
>>> + ksft_exit_fail_msg(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d, errno = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags, errno);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ksft_test_result_pass(
>>> + "%s test: flags = %d\n",
>>> + test_name, flags);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -71,7 +141,16 @@ static int test_membarrier(void)
>>> status = test_membarrier_flags_fail();
>>> if (status)
>>> return status;
>>> - status = test_membarrier_success();
>>> + status = test_membarrier_shared_success();
>>> + if (status)
>>> + return status;
>>> + status = test_membarrier_private_expedited_fail();
>>> + if (status)
>>> + return status;
>>> + status = test_membarrier_register_private_expedited_success();
>>> + if (status)
>>> + return status;
>>> + status = test_membarrier_private_expedited_success();
>>> if (status)
>>> return status;
>>> return 0;
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
