On 09/07/2017 10:19 AM, naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> The test script works when kernel source and build module test_bpf.ko present on the machine. This patch will check if module is present in the path. Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good, what changed between v1 and v2? Didn't get the cover letter in case there was one. ;) Which tree are you targeting? There are usually a lot of changes in BPF selftests going the usual route via net and net-next tree as we often require to put test cases along the BPF patches. Given the merge window now and given one can regard it as a fix, it's net tree. I'm also ok if Shuah wants to pick it up this window as test_kmod.sh hasn't been changed in quite a while, so no merge conflicts expected. Anyway, for the patch: Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh index 6d58cca8e235..a53eb1cb54ef 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ test_run() echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]" dmesg -C - insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null - if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - rc=1 + if [ -f $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko ]; then + insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + rc=1 + fi fi rmmod test_bpf 2> /dev/null dmesg | grep FAIL
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
