On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/10/2017 06:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This patch series consists of changes to: >>> >>> Move ksft_ stubs from individual tests into kselftest_stubs.h and change >>> tests to include it. >>> >>> Fix posix_timers and freq-step tests to run without ksft_ framework. >>> >>> This is in preparation to convert timers tests to ksft TAP 13 format. >>> >>> Question for John Stultz: >>> >>> The conversion work will be easier without the requirement to be able to >>> build and run these tests without ksft_ framework. So far the stubs are >>> simpler. It is might be necessary to ifdef some code paths to have sane >>> output for both KTEST and !KTEST cases. >>> >>> Would it be easier to pull in kselftest.h into timers external repo >>> (if one still exists). This is based on the observation that newer >>> timer tests don't support !KTEST case e.g: posix_timers and freq-step. >>> >>> Please review and let me know how you would like me to proceed with the >>> conversion. I am looking for answer to how important is it to continue to >>> support !KTEST case. >> >> Yea. I'm thinking at this point I'm fine with dropping the attempt to >> keep kselftest and my external timekeeping tests in sync. > > Would you like me to clean !KTEST support or leave it the way it is. > It sounds like, I will drop these patches anyway. Yea. I think its ok to drop !KTEST. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
