On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 11:59:06 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 00:52:32 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Can we add an option in kselftest, or to ftracetest that decides if > > > unsupported is a failure or not? Otherwise I can not ack this patch. > > > > I would rather like to add an option to ftracetest instead of > > kselftest, because whether the tested feature should be supported > > or not is hard to decide from testing framework. It should be > > checked by manual. > > Can we do both? That is, add an option to have ftracetest not fail on > "unsupported" but have it fail by default. We can have kselftest just > pass in a parameter to ftracetest that has unsupported not fail? I rather like to treat unsupported as success (or XFAIL) by default and add "--fail-unsupported" option. Thank you, > But if that is too difficult, then I can live with modifying my test > case to add the option. > > -- Steve -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
