On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote: > > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]: > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4): > > > > > module: use list_for_each_entry_rcu() on find_module_all() > > > > > kmod: reduce atomic operations on kmod_concurrent and simplify > > > > > kmod: add test driver to stress test the module loader > > > > > kmod: throttle kmod thread limit > > > > > > > > About a month now with no further nitpicks. What tree should these changes > > > > go through if there are no issues? Andrew's, Jessica's ? > > > > > > Seems like going through Jessica's would make the most sense? > > > > Would be happy to take patches 01 (which I need to anyway), 02, > > possibly 04 if decoupled from the test driver (03). > > Feel free to decouple it, but note that then the commit log must then be > changed. My own take is this fix is not so critical as it is a corner case, so > I have instead preferred to couple in the test case and respective fix > together. I'll leave it up to you how to proceed. Note: Linus noted swait is actually very special use-case [0] so I'd hate to add a new use case not vetted for. This use case on kmod.c really does *not* require anything but a simple wait though, so really am inclined to let that through unless I hear back... [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170627001534.GK21846@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
