Hi Kees, Andy, On 15 June 2017 at 23:26, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 3. 'seccomp ptrace hole closure' patches got added in 4.7 [3] - > feature and test together. > - This one also seems like a security hole being closed, and the > 'feature' could be a candidate for stable backports, but Arnd tried > that, and it was quite non-trivial. So perhaps we'll need some help > from the subsystem developers here. Could you please help us sort this out? Our goal is to help Greg with testing stable kernels, and currently the seccomp tests fail due to missing feature (seccomp ptrace hole closure) getting tested via latest kselftest. If you feel the feature isn't a stable candidate, then could you please help make the test degrade gracefully in its absence? Greatly appreciated! Thanks and best regards, Sumit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
