Re: [PATCH 2/3] kselftest: membarrier: make test names more informative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/15/2017 10:00 AM, Paul Elder wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 12:56 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Paul Elder <paul.elder@xxxxxxxx <mailto:paul.elder@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Make membarrier test names more informative.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@xxxxxxxx <mailto:paul.elder@xxxxxxxx>>
>>     ---
>>      tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c | 4 ++--
>>      1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>     diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>     b/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>     index cae8c984dfb0..7925fcf9262b 100644
>>     --- a/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>     +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c
>>     @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static int sys_membarrier(int cmd, int flags)
>>      static enum test_membarrier_status test_membarrier_cmd_fail(void)
>>      {
>>             int cmd = -1, flags = 0;
>>     -       const char *test_name = "membarrier command fail";
>>     +       const char *test_name = "membarrier command cmd=-1. Wrong command should fail";
>>
>>             if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != -1) {
>>                     ksft_test_result_fail(test_name);
>>     @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static enum test_membarrier_status test_membarrier_cmd_fail(void)
>>      static enum test_membarrier_status test_membarrier_flags_fail(void)
>>      {
>>             int cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY, flags = 1;
>>     -       const char *test_name = "Wrong flags should fail";
>>     +       const char *test_name = "MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY, flags=1, Wrong flags should fail";
>>
>>             if (sys_membarrier(cmd, flags) != -1) {
>>                     ksft_test_result_fail(test_name);
>>     --
>>     2.11.0
>>
>>
>> this is same as the patch I already sended
>> [PATCH v3 2/5] kselftest: membarrier: convert to TAP13 output
> Yes, I realize that. However, this is based on linux-kselftest next latest.
> 
> Not sure what to do.
> 

Paul/Alice,

I will review this one as it is based on linux-kselftest next as per
my request.

Maybe you both can coordinate on patches and decide ahead of time which
ones you are going to work on. Will it make easier for the reviewers.

thanks,
-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux