Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests, x86, pkeys: test with random, unallocated protection keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/24/2017 12:45 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 02/23/2017 03:26 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>> Shuah, I assume you'll take this patch in through the selftests tree.
> >>
> >> Yes I can do that.
> > 
> > No, let's not do that please, we have a fix and a self-tests update, I'd like them 
> > to be next in the Git space.
> > 
> > I'll apply the testcase too when applying the pkeys fix, ok?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Yup. I noticed the first patch has to go through x86 tree, Sounds good
> to me. Please take both through. I am sending pull request for 4.11-rc1
> today. I have a few pkeys patches in there. Hope there won't be any
> conflicts.

Ok, I'll wait for your changes to hit upstream, to not create unnecessary 
conflicts.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux