Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Tests for sync infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2016 06:17 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 06:49 AM, Emilio López wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This is a series of tests to exercise the sync kernel infrastructure. It is
>> meant to be a test suite for the work Gustavo has been doing to destage it.
>>
>> These tests were originally part of a battery of tests shipping with
>> Android's libsync that were rewritten to use the new userspace interfaces.
>>
>> This is the second iteration of the test suite. Main changes over v1 are
>> a reworked Makefile and small code style fixes.
>>
>> If you are testing this on v4.9-rc1, do note that the last test will
>> currently fail due to a regression[0].
> 
> Hi Emilio,
> 
> Thanks. I will apply these to linux-kselftest next for 4.10-rc1
> 
> -- Shuah
>>
>> As usual, all comments are welcome.
>>

Hi Emilio,

Applied to linux-kselftest next. Could you take a look at the output
and see if it can be refined. Does [BAD] mean the test failed? Results
could refined to help user understand if a test failed or not clearly.
This can be done in a separate patch as a fix in one of the 4.01-rcs

thanks,
-- Shuah

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux