Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE2 to define sys_arch_prctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:39:50AM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote:
>
> <--- Add commit message here.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 ++-
>>  arch/x86/um/syscalls_64.c    | 3 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
>>  void arch_switch_to(struct task_struct *to)
>>  {
>>       if ((to->thread.arch.fs == 0) || (to->mm == NULL))
>>               return;
>>
>> base-commit: e3a00f68e426df24a5fb98956a1bd1b23943aa1e
>
> This looks like some tracking thing. It gets ignored by tools though...

Yeah despite git format-patch generating it, git doesn't automatically
honor it when applying patches.

- Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux