On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a new do_arch_prctl to handle arch_prctls that are not specific to 64
> bits. Call it from the syscall entry point, but not any of the other
> callsites in the kernel, which all want one of the existing 64 bit only
> arch_prctls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> index 95c3e51..94a57cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ void x86_report_nx(void);
>
> extern int reboot_force;
>
> +long do_arch_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2);
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 62c0b0e..97aa104 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -567,3 +567,8 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
> } while (count++ < 16 && p->state != TASK_RUNNING);
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +long do_arch_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
This should be do_arch_prctl_common or similar to avoid confusion.
P.S. The subject should be "x86/arch_prctl: ...".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
