Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_SET_{COMPAT,NATIVE} to change compatible mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/08/2016 06:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello again,
what do you think about attached patch?
I think it should fix landing problem for i386 vdso mremap.
It does not touch fast syscall path, so there should be no
speed regression.
For this thing:

+    /* Fixing userspace landing - look at do_fast_syscall_32 */
+    if (current_thread_info()->status & TS_COMPAT)
+        regs->ip = (unsigned long)current->mm->context.vdso +
+            vdso_image_32.sym_int80_landing_pad;

Either check that ip was where you expected it
And if it's not there - return error?
  or simply remove this
code -- user programs that are mremapping the vdso are already playing
with fire and can just use int $0x80 to do it.

Other than that, it looks generally sane.  The .mremap hook didn't
exist last time I looked at this :)

The main downside of your approach is that it doesn't allow switching
between the 32-bit, 64-bit, and x32 images.  Also, it requires
awareness of how vvar and vdso line up, whereas a dedicated API could
do the whole thing.
Yes, I'm working on it. This patch will only allow moving vdso
image with general mremap - so I could use arch_prctl for
that API, as for native i386 one may move vdso with mremap
and cannot map any other vdso blobs.
Does it sound fine?

So, I have some difficulties with removing TIF_IA32 flag:
it's checked by perf for interpreting stack frames/instructions
and may be checked out of syscall executing (when tracing
page fault events, for example). I doubt, is it sane to remove
TS_COMPAT instead, leaving TIF_IA32, as for some cases
we need to know if task is compatible outside of syscall's path?
And the comment in asm/syscall.h says:
>  * TIF_IA32 tasks should always have TS_COMPAT set at
>  * system call time.
that means, that TS_COMPAT is always set on TIF_IA32, so
is meaningless.
What do you think?

Thanks,
Dmitry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux