Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] selftest: sync: basic tests for sw_sync framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Emilio,

On 9 March 2016 at 15:28, Emilio López <emilio.lopez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These tests are based on the libsync test suite from Android.
> This commit lays the ground for future tests, as well as includes
> tests for a variety of basic allocation commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>

>  tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync.h       | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
Admittedly I know nothing about the kernel selftests although copying
the UAPI header, seems to defeat the purpose of this exercise.
Shouldn't one reuse the existing header ? It would even cause issues
as the interface gets updated (iirc Gustavo changed the ioctl numbers
and/or header name with latter series).

Regards,
Emil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux