On 3/7/25 12:58, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 07/03/2025 10:47, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 3/7/25 12:45, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:36:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> On 3/7/25 12:30, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/synopsys/hdmirx/snps_hdmirx.c b/drivers/media/platform/synopsys/hdmirx/snps_hdmirx.c
>>>>> index 4ffc86ad6c35..e0d3fed87a92 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/synopsys/hdmirx/snps_hdmirx.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/synopsys/hdmirx/snps_hdmirx.c
>>>>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ struct snps_hdmirx_dev {
>>>>> bool hpd_trigger_level_high;
>>>>> bool tmds_clk_ratio;
>>>>> bool plugged;
>>>>> - u32 num_clks;
>>>>> + int num_clks;
>>>>> u32 edid_blocks_written;
>>>>> u32 cur_fmt_fourcc;
>>>>> u32 color_depth;
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Would be also good to return the original error code. There is no need
>>>> to check for the < 1 clock, it should be the < 0 check. Can be done in a
>>>> separate patch later. Thanks for the fix!
>>>
>>> I'm not very familiar with th edevm_clk_bulk_get_all() function and it's
>>> not documented. But clk_bulk_get_all() does return zero, so I can see why
>>> people would be confused.
>>
>> We will take care of it, thanks again.
>>
>
> I'm confused. Is Dan's patch correct or is more work needed? If more work is
> needed, then I prefer to have a single patch correcting the devm_clk_bulk_get_all()
> handling.
Dan's patch is good, please merge it.
Propagation of original error code that I said about will be additional
improvement.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
