On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 07:41:25AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote: > > > > > > In general, why not, but the label naming is bad. > > > It hides the original intent to discard this message. > > > Let's rename existing label to discard_nocb: and leave a new one as discard:. > > > Also, the patch will be smaller in this way. > > > > Do you expect a third patch version according to your naming preferences? > > > > Regards, > > Markus > > I prefer to, as the current patch reduces this code readability. > > - - > Thanks, > Sasha > > Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
