On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:59:54AM -0800, Frank van der Linden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:21 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Smatch complains that "next" could be uninitialized. The "next"
> > assignment was accidentally left out when we moved these lines to earlier
> > in the function.
> >
> > Fixes: bdadaec1526d ("x86/mm: make register_page_bootmem_memmap handle PTE mappings")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This goes through the -mm tree.
> >
> > arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > index e7572af639a4..6e8e4ef5312a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > @@ -1600,8 +1600,10 @@ void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr,
> > get_page_bootmem(section_nr, pud_page(*pud), MIX_SECTION_INFO);
> >
> > pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> > - if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> > + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
> > + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> > continue;
> > + }
> >
> > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE) || !pmd_leaf(*pmd)) {
> > next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> > --
> > 2.47.2
> >
>
> Thanks for catching that Dan. I believe Andrew took the series out of
> mm-unstable because of some conflicts, and asked me to do a v4 for
> mm-unstable. Would you mind if I just folded your change in to the v4
> series?
Yeah, no problem. -mm patches are always folded.
regards,
dan carpenter
