On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 07:55:22AM -0500, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Commit a3ed4157b7d8 ("fgraph: Replace fgraph_ret_regs with ftrace_regs")
> replaces the config HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL with the config
> HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS, and it replaces all the select commands in the
> various architecture Kconfig files. In the arm64 architecture, the commit
> adds the 'select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS', but misses to remove the
> 'select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL', i.e., the select on the replaced
> config.
>
> Remove selecting the replaced config. No functional change, just cleanup.
>
> Fixes: a3ed4157b7d8 ("fgraph: Replace fgraph_ret_regs with ftrace_regs")
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Hmm. There are still a couple of CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL guards
kicking around:
include/linux/ftrace.h:#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL
kernel/trace/fgraph.c:#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL
so it's not clear we can just remove the option from arm64 without
breaking ftrace_return_to_handler(). What am I missing?
Will
