On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:52:49 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > It is more like removing broken functionality than fixing (maybe whole > > commit should be reverted). Anyway returning not support is also fine. > > I defer to other maintainers. The gaps are trivial to fill in, we'll > do so as soon as this patch makes it to net-next (this patch needs to > target net). Having slept on it, I think you're right. Su Hui, could you send a revert of d85ebade02e8 instead? It's around 126 LoC, not too bad.
