Re: [PATCH] sh: intc: use after free in register_intc_controller()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 11:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> In the error handling, for this function, we kfree(d) without ever
> removing it from the &intc_list which would lead to a use after free.  To
> fix this, lets only add it to the list after everything has succeeded.
> 
> Fixes: 2dcec7a988a1 ("sh: intc: set_irq_wake() support")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is highly speculative and I am not able to test it.  Please,
> review with care.
> 
>  drivers/sh/intc/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> index 74350b5871dc..ea571eeb3078 100644
> --- a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ int __init register_intc_controller(struct intc_desc *desc)
>  		goto err0;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->list);
> -	list_add_tail(&d->list, &intc_list);
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&d->lock);
>  	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&d->tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
> @@ -369,6 +368,7 @@ int __init register_intc_controller(struct intc_desc *desc)
>  
>  	d->skip_suspend = desc->skip_syscore_suspend;
>  
> +	list_add_tail(&d->list, &intc_list);
>  	nr_intc_controllers++;
>  
>  	return 0;

I think this approach is more sensible than the one suggested by Ridong Chen
and I'm therefor egoing to pick this one over the other solution.

Reviewed-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux