On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:08:35 +0100
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is a check on non-zero ret that is redundant because the
> same check is being performed in a previous if statement and
> also before that. The check is not required, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied. Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/pressure/rohm-bm1390.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/rohm-bm1390.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/rohm-bm1390.c
> index ccaa07a569c9..f24d9f927681 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/rohm-bm1390.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/rohm-bm1390.c
> @@ -410,23 +410,20 @@ static int __bm1390_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *idev, unsigned int samples,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> if (test_bit(BM1390_CHAN_TEMP, idev->active_scan_mask)) {
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, BM1390_REG_TEMP_HI, &temp,
> sizeof(temp));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < smp_lvl; i++) {
> buffer[i].temp = temp;
> iio_push_to_buffers(idev, &buffer[i]);
> }
>
> return smp_lvl;
> }
>
> static int bm1390_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *idev, unsigned int samples)
> {
