>> I was notified also about the following adjustment. >> >> … >> * linuxppc-dev: [resent,v2,1/2] powerpc/pseries: Do not pass an error pointer to of_node_put() in pSeries_reconfig_add_node() >> - https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Flinuxppc-dev%2Fpatch%2Ff5ac19db-c7d5-9a94-aa37-9bb448fe665f%40web.de%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cab19d1c85de343f5474908dce3cd8c02%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638635719164841772%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8b7APXbglDf13PvZ4nVh5Z92bEft2RBqU3LfKsUETOI%3D&reserved=0 >> - for: Linux PPC development >> was: New >> now: Changes Requested >> … >> >> It seems that I can not see so far why this status update happened >> for any reasons. >> Will further clarifications become helpful here? > > Sorry I forgot to send the email. It is the same kind of problem as the other series: Message IDs and/or In-Reply-To headers are messed up Three mailing list archive interfaces can present a mostly consistent view for the involved message threads, can't they? > and b4 ends up applying an unrelated patch instead of applying the series as you can see below: > > $ b4 shazam f5ac19db-c7d5-9a94-aa37-9bb448fe665f@xxxxxx … This development tool is also still evolving. Are you looking for corresponding software extensions? https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/#getting-help How do you think about to start with the desired cover letter from the provided patch series for another integration attempt? Regards, Markus
