These are called from blkcg_print_blkgs() which already disables IRQs so
disabling it again is wrong. It means that IRQs will be enabled slightly
earlier than intended, however, so far as I can see, this bug is harmless.
Fixes: 35198e323001 ("blk-iocost: read params inside lock in sysfs apis")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-iocost.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 9dc9323f84ac..384aa15e8260 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -3166,7 +3166,7 @@ static u64 ioc_qos_prfill(struct seq_file *sf, struct blkg_policy_data *pd,
if (!dname)
return 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&ioc->lock);
+ spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
seq_printf(sf, "%s enable=%d ctrl=%s rpct=%u.%02u rlat=%u wpct=%u.%02u wlat=%u min=%u.%02u max=%u.%02u\n",
dname, ioc->enabled, ioc->user_qos_params ? "user" : "auto",
ioc->params.qos[QOS_RPPM] / 10000,
@@ -3179,7 +3179,7 @@ static u64 ioc_qos_prfill(struct seq_file *sf, struct blkg_policy_data *pd,
ioc->params.qos[QOS_MIN] % 10000 / 100,
ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] / 10000,
ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] % 10000 / 100);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -3366,14 +3366,14 @@ static u64 ioc_cost_model_prfill(struct seq_file *sf,
if (!dname)
return 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&ioc->lock);
+ spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
seq_printf(sf, "%s ctrl=%s model=linear "
"rbps=%llu rseqiops=%llu rrandiops=%llu "
"wbps=%llu wseqiops=%llu wrandiops=%llu\n",
dname, ioc->user_cost_model ? "user" : "auto",
u[I_LCOEF_RBPS], u[I_LCOEF_RSEQIOPS], u[I_LCOEF_RRANDIOPS],
u[I_LCOEF_WBPS], u[I_LCOEF_WSEQIOPS], u[I_LCOEF_WRANDIOPS]);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
