Hello Alexander, Arnd, On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 16:59 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > Hi Arnd, Nikita, > > On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 14:54 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 08:14, Nikita Shubin wrote: > > > Hi Dan! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Alexander, Arnd > > > > > > unfortunately, the ep93xx DT conversion series is also affected > > > by this > > > bug. > > > > Here is what I did now: > > > > 1. applied Dan's patch on a new branch > > 2. applied the DT conversion series on top of that, > > removing that file. > > 3. applied the first patch (with minor context changes) > > in drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c again, along with > > the MODULE_LICENSE fix I did. > > 4. finally, merged the entire branch into my for-next > > branch so it actually makes it into linux-next > > > > My plan now is to keep the branch in linux-next for at > > least a week and send all the other pull requests for > > the merge window first. If no other problems show up > > (either with this branch or my other 6.12 contents), > > I hope to send it all later in the merge window. If > > something goes wrong, I'll send only the bugfix as part > > of my first fixes branch for 6.12 and we'll defer the > > DT conversion once more. > > > > I should have merged it earlier, but wasn't sure about > > interdependencies with the parts that already got merged > > elsewhere and with the comments about DTC warnings. > > > > From what I can tell, the current state is as good as > > it gets, as we'll always get more comments or conflicts > > with new reversions of the series. Let's hope we can > > address any other issues on top of what I've merged > > now and stop rebasing. > > thanks Arnd for resolving this finally and Nikita for > your relentless efforts! > > PS. I've archived Subject patch now in soc patchwork > (because I think I've messed up the author info, but > all of this seems to be obsolete now) > thank you for your work and support!
