Re: [PATCH next] btrfs: Fix reversed condition in copy_inline_to_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dan,

在 2024/8/27 18:21, Dan Carpenter 写道:
This if statement is reversed leading to locking issues.

Fixes: 8e603cfe05f0 ("btrfs: convert copy_inline_to_page() to use folio")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is obviously correct but it's from static analysis so additional
testing would be good as well.

  fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
index 1681d63f03dd..f0824c948cb7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int copy_inline_to_page(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
  	btrfs_folio_clear_checked(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
  	btrfs_folio_set_dirty(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
  out_unlock:
-	if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
+	if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
This is a mistake caused by my carelessness,thank you for the patch
  		folio_unlock(folio);
  		folio_put(folio);
  	}

Can I merge your patch into my patchset and add you as a co-author?

Thanks,
Li Zetao.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux