Re: [PATCH] smb/client: avoid possible NULL dereference in cifs_free_subrequest()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 10:01 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:23:32PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> > Clang static checker (scan-build) warning:
> >       cifsglob.h:line 890, column 3
> >       Access to field 'ops' results in a dereference of a null pointer.
> >
> > Commit 519be989717c ("cifs: Add a tracepoint to track credits involved in
> > R/W requests") adds a check for 'rdata->server', and let clang throw this
> > warning about NULL dereference.
> >
> > When 'rdata->credits.value != 0 && rdata->server == NULL' happens,
> > add_credits_and_wake_if() will call rdata->server->ops->add_credits().
> > This will cause NULL dereference problem. Add a check for 'rdata->server'
> > to avoid NULL dereference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Needs a Fixes tag.

I had added a fixes tag

> Also when you add a Fixes tag, then get_maintainer will add the David Howells
> automatically.  I've added him manually.
>
> > ---
> >  fs/smb/client/file.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/smb/client/file.c b/fs/smb/client/file.c
> > index b2405dd4d4d4..45459af5044d 100644
> > --- a/fs/smb/client/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/smb/client/file.c
> > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void cifs_free_subrequest(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq)
> >  #endif
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (rdata->credits.value != 0)
> > +     if (rdata->credits.value != 0) {
> >               trace_smb3_rw_credits(rdata->rreq->debug_id,
> >                                     rdata->subreq.debug_index,
> >                                     rdata->credits.value,
> > @@ -323,8 +323,12 @@ static void cifs_free_subrequest(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq)
> >                                     rdata->server ? rdata->server->in_flight : 0,
> >                                     -rdata->credits.value,
> >                                     cifs_trace_rw_credits_free_subreq);
> > +             if (rdata->server)
> > +                     add_credits_and_wake_if(rdata->server, &rdata->credits, 0);
> > +             else
> > +                     rdata->credits.value = 0;
>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Why do this?

add_credits_and_wake() has the effect of setting credits->value to 0
so seems reasonable here
(in the case where add_credits_and_wake can not be safely called),
even if an extremely unlikely for rdata->server to be null.





-- 
Thanks,

Steve





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux