On 24/07/19 04:17PM, Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:12:51 +0200 > > Adjust the colour selection so that a bit of duplicate code can be avoided > in this function implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > index 8449f2beb54d..e29ae5cb95b0 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > @@ -1258,12 +1258,16 @@ static size_t fprintf_duration(unsigned long t, bool calculated, FILE *fp) > > if (!calculated) > printed += fprintf(fp, " "); > - else if (duration >= 1.0) > - printed += color_fprintf(fp, PERF_COLOR_RED, "%6.3f ms", duration); > - else if (duration >= 0.01) > - printed += color_fprintf(fp, PERF_COLOR_YELLOW, "%6.3f ms", duration); > else > - printed += color_fprintf(fp, PERF_COLOR_NORMAL, "%6.3f ms", duration); > + printed += color_fprintf(fp, > + (duration >= 1.0 > + ? PERF_COLOR_RED > + : (duration >= 0.01 > + ? PERF_COLOR_YELLOW > + : PERF_COLOR_NORMAL)), > + "%6.3f ms", > + duration); Why is this a desirable change? Folding the if-statements into the ternary operator makes the code quite unreadable compared to what it was like before and doesn't give any obvious improvement.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature