On 7/16/2024 1:20 AM, Stefan Haberland wrote: > Am 14.07.24 um 18:58 schrieb Jeff Johnson: >> On 7/1/24 03:57, Stefan Haberland wrote: >>> Am 16.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson: >>>> With ARCH=s390, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: >>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in >>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag_mod.o >>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in >>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.o >>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in >>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba_mod.o >>>> >>>> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >>> >> >> I still don't see this in linux-next. Does your tree feed into >> linux-next, or will it go into Linus' tree during the merge window? >> >> Hoping to have these warnings fixed tree-wide in 6.11 > > Sorry for the delay. > > The DASD patches usually go upstream through the linux-block tree. I > have sent them yesterday and Jens already applied them. > thanks!
