> child_device_obj->device cannot perform DMA properly if dma_set_mask() > returns non-zero. … Can the repetition of another wording suggestion influence the software evolution? Direct memory access can not be properly performed any more after a dma_set_mask() call failed. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc6/source/kernel/dma/mapping.c#L804 … > Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <make24@xxxxxxxxxxx> Under which circumstances will applications of the Developer's Certificate of Origin be reconsidered any more (after three different names were presented so far)? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc6#n398 Would you like to append parentheses to another function name in the summary phrase? Regards, Markus
