On 6/10/2024 2:05 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:06:49AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 07/06/24 18:02, Jeff Johnson ha scritto:
>>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> index 19a87873ad60..0b5d68a90e83 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> @@ -395,4 +395,5 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_mediatek_driver = {
>>> module_platform_driver(pwm_mediatek_driver);
>>> MODULE_AUTHOR("John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek Pulse Width Modulator driver");
>>
>> MediaTek SoCs have got two different PWM IPs, one of which is used exclusively
>> for the Display PWM, and it is located in the DDP block.
>>
>> So, there are two PWM IPs in one SoC:
>> - A general purpose PWM IP
>> - A DDP PWM IP
>>
>> This driver is for the general purpose PWM IP.. so, please, can we change this
>> to "MediaTek general purpose Pulse Width Modulator driver"?
>>
>> After which,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks like a reasonable request.
>
> @Jeff: Can you please resend with the suggested change, I dropped the
> patch from for-next now.
No problem, v2 sent.
/jeff
