On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 10:38:39PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 05:21:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Smatch complains correctly that the NULL checking isn't consistent:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c:2583 it6505_poweron()
> > error: we previously assumed 'pdata->pwr18' could be null
> > (see line 2569)
> >
> > Add a NULL check to prevent a NULL dereference on the error path.
> >
> > Fixes: b5c84a9edcd4 ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > index 3f68c82888c2..4f01fadaec0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > @@ -2580,7 +2580,8 @@ static int it6505_poweron(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > err = regulator_enable(pdata->ovdd);
> > if (err) {
> > - regulator_disable(pdata->pwr18);
> > + if (pdata->pwr18)
> > + regulator_disable(pdata->pwr18);
>
> Wait... I wat too quick to R-B it. The driver uses devm_regulator_get(),
> which always returns non-NULL result. So all `if (pdata->pwr18)` and
> `if (pdata->ovdd)` checks in the driver are useless. Could you please
> send a patch, removing them?
>
Sure. Will do.
regards,
dan carpenter
