> What exactly is the problem? Another development concern (for example): I would like to benefit a bit more from information which is provided as parameters for macro calls. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc2/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L179 Thus I hope that something can be achieved by “advanced” source code analyses also with help of the semantic patch language. May I expect that some data should be presented according to the following tiny SmPL script? @display@ @@ *DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(...) Test result: Markus_Elfring@Sonne:…/Projekte/Linux/next-analyses/include/linux> spatch --include-headers …/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/show_lock_guard_definitions.cocci spinlock.h … No data are displayed by the software combination “Coccinelle 1.2-00008-g75525032” (because of the specified SmPL asterisk) according to the selected macro call. See also another known information source for further development considerations: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc2/source/include/linux/spinlock.h#L537 Regards, Markus
